Building Digital Infrastructure for Climate Action With Allen Fan of CarbonHQ
- Premiere Date: June 11, 2026
Show notes & key takeaways
In this episode of Survey & Beyond: The Data Collection Podcast, host Marta Costa sits down with Allen Fan, Co-founder of CarbonHQ, to uncover how CarbonHQ is building the digital infrastructure that carbon project developers need to manage data from multiple sources, automate quality checks, and ultimately compress credit issuance from years down to weeks through digital Measurement, Reporting, and Verification (dMRV).
What You’ll Learn:
- Why carbon credit quality is fundamentally determined by data quality
- How dMRV can compress credit issuance timelines from 6-36 months down to weeks
- Why manual data validation processes break at scale
- How to implement consistent data naming conventions and unique identifiers across all forms and partners
- And more!
Allen Fan is the Co-founder of CarbonHQ, bringing expertise in digital measurement, reporting, and verification (dMRV) systems within the carbon markets. With a multifaceted background spanning auditing and consulting at Big Four firms, venture capital, and carbon project finance, Alan has developed a deep understanding of the operational challenges facing carbon project developers globally.
If you enjoyed this episode, make sure to subscribe, rate, and review on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, and Youtube Podcasts. Instructions on how to do this are here.
Episode Resources:
Episode transcript
[00:00:01] Allen: And I don’t think anyone really started in the carbon industry. I was pretty burnt out at my last job as well. My first couple of jobs was at Big Four, initially audit at EY, and then consulting at PwC. Yeah. The big one is obviously DMRV, basically digitizing the entire monetary reporting verification purpose process and hopefully streamlining what used to be a 6 to 36-month process down to hopefully a matter of weeks.
[00:00:31] Marta: Today on Survey and Beyond, we are joined by Allen Fan, cofounder of CarbonHQ. With a background in auditing, consulting, venture capital, and carbon project finance, Allen is here to show us how better data systems can improve transparency, strengthen trust in carbon markets, and help scale climate action globally. Welcome, Allen, to the Survey and Beyond podcast.
[00:00:55] Allen: Thank you, Martha, for having me.
[00:00:57] Marta: So, we are going to dive into the carbon development space today. But before that, before explaining what that is and providing our listeners with some context, I would love to know a bit more about your career journey because I know you didn’t start originally in this industry. So, just let us know. How did you end up here?
[00:01:20] Allen: Yeah. Absolutely. And I don’t think anyone really started in the carbon industry. That’s one of the things I love about this industry: people really stumble into it from all walks of life. So, for me, I’m originally from China. I moved to New Zealand with my parents when I was a teenager. And a typical Asian kind of family household dynamic, I had a very limited choice in terms of career options. So, both of my parents were accountants and basically decided from a very early, young age that I was gonna take over the family trade and become an accountant. So, that’s what I ended up studying at university and what I ended up doing after leaving. So, my first couple of jobs was at Big Four, initially audit at EY, and then consulting at PwC. And then it was really in my spare time that I got really interested in the entrepreneurial scene and eventually found myself working at a venture capital fund in New Zealand. And it was there that I always wanted to kind of build a company for my own. I was working with a lot of aspirational founders, but I didn’t find a problem that I was really passionate about solving myself. And, eventually, I moved from New Zealand to Australia back in 2020 or 2021, and I did a new job. So, basically, I came across this job ad on LinkedIn. It was for a project finance, drove at a carbon project developer for a clean cooking carbon project developer. And at that time, I really didn’t know anything about clean cooking, about the carbon industry, and quite frankly, the company looked a bit odd because I only had one person in Australia I thought might have been a scam or something. And all of the teamwork, based in Africa, based in India, and the U.S. So, very typical kind of project developer setup that I know now, but at the time, it was really, really strange. But I interviewed and got to know more about the company and the carbon industry, and became very interested in this space, and that’s how I got into this industry.
[00:03:31] Marta: Yeah. What a nice surprise. Thankfully, you are a risk taker, and you went ahead with the job opportunity. That’s awesome. And now you walked us through your journey, and so we can start talking about the carbon development space for our listeners, for people around the world that never heard about the industry, or have heard about the industry but don’t really know what it is. Could you briefly explain what are we talking about? So, what are you trying to accomplish in this space? What is it?
[00:04:04] Allen: Yeah. So, I guess at a broad level, the carbon industry involves using market mechanisms to fund these very impactful climate-protecting projects across the world. So, typical examples that you see are tree planting, protection of forests, and CarbonHQ works a lot with cookstove project developers, safe water project developers, etc. So, the idea is fairly simple. It’s that if we, as a species, for the last couple of hundred years, haven’t really been taking this external cost of environment and carbon into account in our economic activities, can we actually amend a market mechanism whereby we incentivize the restoring of planet? So, that’s really the very basic way of it, so that people can get rewarded and get paid for benefiting or protecting or improving them as opposed to destroying them.
[00:05:02] Marta: And it’s a space that’s growing. And in that first company you worked for, from what I know, it started scaling. You were doing a great job. You were finding your passion, and it started scaling. But, unfortunately, I feel like the mechanisms that you had, especially how you managed information, it was not proportionally scaling, or it was not at a foundation, no level that would allow you to scale in an efficient way. Is that true?
[00:05:33] Allen: That’s right. I mean, this was back in the very exciting times of the carbon industry 2020, 2021, fueled by a zero-interest-rate era when sustainability, climate protection, is very, very sexy. It’s very, very popular across investors. So, it was a really easy job for us because a lot of investors were very interested. And very quickly, our project portfolio grew for the organization that I was working for at the time, being C-Quest Capital. And very quickly, we started to face the challenges of growth, of scaling as well. Because as part of the investment team, only had I needed to actually walk the investors through the process of getting their money in, but we also had to keep them informed about how the projects are going after that investment is up and running, and that often is the difficult part. So, for a carbon project, it’s very common where you’ve got the project activities on the ground, you’ve got the technical people doing the issuances sitting in a different part of the world, and also the head office being in an entirely different country. So, for me, at the time, I had to work very closely with my colleagues in Africa, with my colleagues in India, to try to, like, figure out what was going on. And at the same time, all of that data was collected and being managed in Excel as well. So, it was really, really painful just to get a holistic understanding of how we’re performing on the carbon project. I remember the operations team on the ground would have this one Excel spreadsheet, and then the technical team would have a different Excel spreadsheet, and the sales team would have a different Excel spreadsheet. And it was my job at the end of the month to tie all of these things together to figure out what is actually happening. So, it was at that point when the market was still really, really, I guess, at a very good place, at a very exciting place, when I thought to myself, hey, this industry is truly going to scale and reach the climate impact that it’s aiming for, then carbon project developers also need to scale. And the way that they’re working also needs to scale and be more professional as well. So, that’s when I really thought to myself about, okay, is there a space to create a solution here that helps carbon project developers run their processes more professionally and also, at the end of the day, help drive efficiency and project integrity throughout the entire industry.
[00:08:13] Marta: So, that’s when you made the decision to found CarbonHQ?
[00:08:17] Allen: That’s right. I mean, I was pretty burnt out at my last drama as well, so I was looking for an escape. But, basically, combined with my previous passion for being an entrepreneur, I had finally felt that, okay, I found my calling. I found my purpose. This is what I was kind of destined to do. I was being put through the experiences of working within a carbon project developer, so I can actually work on this problem as a founder, as an entrepreneur. And I felt that is going to give me enough, let’s say, like, resilience and commitment to, like, actually stand behind a company.
[00:08:54] Marta: Yeah. That makes a lot of sense. And at CarbonHQ, you mentioned that you are lifting carbon projects out of offline documents. So, I think this might relate to what you were mentioning. You had a lot of different spreadsheets, a lot of different PDFs. So, how are you changing that now? How are you making the process more efficient for everyone?
[00:09:15] Allen: So, I guess before covering, like, how we’re doing things, let’s talk about, like, how project developers are currently doing things or how they were doing things without CarbonHQ. So, in the old world, data about carbon projects would be collected using a data collection tool like SurveyCTO or KoboToolbox, and then it would basically go into Excel after that. And people would manually clean it up or, like, identify errors and make changes to the data offline. And then, basically, a whole bunch of numbers and calculations would be performed on the data that is collected to actually derive the technical parameters and the numbers for their carbon credit verification purposes. And kind of these numbers would be then turned into Excel workbooks, PDF reports, monitoring reports, and then sent to BVPs and sent to standard bodies. So, by the time that standard bodies receive the information, it’s all in offline, like, kind of unstructured data. They’re receiving PDFs, and they have to then manually go through that data to perform their verification workflow, which means it takes a super long time to actually issue the credits. I think during the height of the industry cycle, it was taking the standard bodies anywhere between 6 to almost 36 months to issue credits. And, again, that’s also due to a lot of the problems that the project developers have with their data. But imagine if you were running a business and you had to wait three years to actually receive the product that you want to sell. Obviously, that’s a huge burden on your cash flow. That’s a huge burden on your working capital. And at the end of the day, that’s going to require you to rely more on outside investment to keep the project up running. And what does that do? That just means you need to issue more credits to pay back the investors. What does that do? That just means all of a sudden, project developers are pressured to issue as many credits as they possibly can. And that is really, I think, the core driver of some of these scandals that we’ve seen in the market over the last few years. So, how are we doing things? Basically, we see the path forward for this industry being automated, being digital, being really, really efficient. But then we also realize for that to happen, that whole digitization effort needs to start with carbon project developers, where the data is collected, not when it gets to standard bodies. So, we took a really good look at how project developers were working at the time, and we decided that we’re going to give project developers a very native digital tool that is built for how they work. So, they can bring through their data collection software, integrate it with CarbonHQ, and we automatically structure that data across different sources, across different forms. So they, as opposed to working with half a dozen of different data structures or different names, now, they’re only working with one consistent data structure from the get-go. Sounds simple, but it’s actually something that a lot of project developers are struggling with. And then from there, we look at, okay, what does project developers need to do next? It’s actually checking the data at a scalable level, automating that, and identifying any issues with their data before it gets to BVPs, before it gets to standard volumes, so that there are no issues and there’s no back and forth when it gets to those organizations. So, our product has a whole bunch of validation features that help project developers to identify these things. And right now, what we’re building is actually the DMRV part, the credit calculation engine, so that project developers can actually plug the data that they’ve collected into a methodology-aligned calculation engine to actually produce these outputs for verification purposes. And that’s hopefully going to be shared directly with the standard bodies like Go Standard and VERA through APIs. So, hopefully, they can then run automated processes on their end and really, really cut down how long it takes to issue credits. And, hopefully, once credits are issued, it’s tied directly to the data that’s underlying that’s supporting that claim of a common credit reduction or removal, and really increasing the transparency and the quality of current credit asset class.
[00:13:40] Marta: Absolutely. And I think a lot of people might not be aware of how data-heavy these projects are. You just mentioned so many different data processes, different people involved, different stages, and I think this is important for this discussion, where we are talking both about data collection, but I also want to talk with you about the data quality portion. You already you were mentioning the verification rules that you are applying. So, in practice, my understanding is that you need a data collection process, one for the DMRV that you mentioned, which is the digital measurement reporting and verification process to calculate the credits, but you also need to have, in a way, a CRM because you are selling products to people. So, you have these two distinct data processes. Is my understanding correct in a way?
[00:14:32] Allen: Yeah. I mean, in a way, it is correct. But at the end of the day, it’s the same dataset for project developers. I mean, they might be collecting data in different ways. Initially, it might be okay; they’re saying that they’re selling a stove. So, okay, I’m, like, recording information about the sale. But what a lot of project developers do not realize is that their product is actually the carbon credit. It’s not the stove that they’re selling because that’s not where they’re driving most of the economic value. So, to your point, there is now a lot of, like, different data being collected for a carbon project if you break it down. So, there might be this kind of, like, cells, like CRM type of information that is being collected when the distribution is made. But now increasingly these days, there’s also incorporation of, like, sensor data of how these stoves or how the carbon project is actually performing in real time. And then subsequently, you also have these, like, monitoring surveys as well, whether it’s for SDGs or whether it’s for just ongoing measurement of the carbon project’s effectiveness. So, it can very easily expand in a way where for a single carbon project, you’ve got, like, 3 or 4 different data sources. And that is before you, like, even consider the different partners you may have running a carbon project. So, a carbon project developer may have two or three or even half a dozen partners that they work with, who individually bring their own data systems to the mix. And that just expands the complexity dramatically. So, one of the things that CarbonHQ has really done this year is building a super flexible data ingestion engine so that it plugs into a lot of these APIs of the popular data collection tools. It plugs into PAYGo software like Upya, for example. And now, PeopleCash bring their sensor data onto CarbonHQ as well. And from there, basically, glue all of these different records together into a single label in order to create a holistic view of their carbon project.
[00:16:38] Marta: And I wanted to ask a few questions about data quality because I feel like in this place, carbon credits, they need to be credible. You need to have a very thorough process to generate this carbon credit. So, data quality is extremely important. And I imagine, at least my assumption is, just by building that digital infrastructure, you are already minimizing a lot of potential errors. You are already making a huge effort in terms of data quality. But what are other data quality risks that you see in the space, and how are you managing those?
[00:17:17] Allen: So, data quality is honestly the most important thing when it comes to carbon projects because, at the end of the day, carbon is just data. So, I think that there has been a great article written about the type of growth for carbon credits. It’s not something that you can touch. It’s not something that you can experience. It’s something that you have to prove to all of these data that you are collecting. So, data quality is the carbon credit quality. There’s no other way to put it. So, what we’re seeing is that a lot of project developers, in recent years, are starting to realize this as well. There hasn’t really been kind of a common understanding in the past, but because of where the market is going, because of what buyers are demanding, because of all of the, unfortunately, like, scandals that happened in the market over the last couple of years. Project developers are really, really starting to realize this, which is fantastic. So, what are some of the common challenges that we see with data quality? A lot of the time, they’re, like, just super basic things, like having consistent names for the data that you’re collecting, right? So, we’ll call it, like, serial number in one form, a serial ID in the other form, and then have, like, a common unique identifier across all of your forms. Just like super basic things. And if you’re going to use a data collection software, try to pick a really good one and try to leverage all of the capabilities that it’s offering. So, SurveyCTO is a very popular one across a lot of our professional project developers. And it’s also, like, a really good sign when they’re using SurveyCTO because we know that they’re treating data collection very, very seriously because of how capable and expandable the product is. But what a lot of people don’t realize is that a lot of these data collection tools have very capable features that might be difficult to implement. But once you implement them, it’s going to prevent poor data from entering the system from the get-go, which is much easier compared to, like, having bad data enter and then trying to do something about it afterwards. So, my advice on that is just to, like, actually sort out the basics.
[00:19:22] Marta: That’s really great advice. And just the unique identifier is such good advice for any industry, any data collection process. So, I really love that. Now, looking back from when you began working in this space and where you are right now, how you are handling and managing projects, what has been most surprising to you? Because I imagine that you are seeing such a change in how you are managing and collecting the data. So, do you have any examples or stories or anything that was really surprising to you?
[00:19:59] Allen: I think what has been really surprising, one, like, specifically about the data is the number of different data sources project developers need to work with. There are so many. And I mentioned when they work with a lot of different partners, that just, like, kind of compounds things even further. Two, how manual it is. The processes are just, like, super manual. But a lot of the time, people are, like, too busy to, like, seek for help as well because they’re drowning in the manual process. That is the problem that should be solved in itself. I guess more generally, I’ve just been impressed or surprised by, like, how resilient people are in this sector, not just like in the carbon space, but in the kind of more broader development space as well. Things haven’t been easy in the last two to three years, but I see a lot of people pushing through because they really believe in the work that they’re doing. And that just gives me a lot of inspiration to push through with the work that I’m doing as well.
[00:21:01] Marta: Looking at how carbon project developers are using CarbonHQ and how they are automating things, what’s something you can share that can inspire others that are still in manual processes to shift? I don’t know if you have any practical examples or things that you have seen changing the work lives of people.
[00:21:22] Allen: Absolutely. I mean, there’s been so many, and it’s not a magical process. It is a software that people need to learn how to use and implement as well, so there is a bit of work involved. But for the people that have really put in the work to embrace it, it’s really changed how they approach data or, like, how they operate on data for their carbon projects. So, for one of our organizations where we’ve replaced their Salesforce with CarbonHQ, they’ve been able to basically completely automate their data checking processes, which used to be all manual. And they operate with, like, millions of cookstoves across different countries and Africa as well. So, I can’t even imagine what that manual process looked like. And it says then this, like, kind of stays with me and our team as well. It was just like a comment from one of their product managers when they said CarbonHQ is kind of now, like, the heart of their operations. And that’s just given us so much encouragement about the work that we’re doing because we’re seeing how the work that we’re doing is helping people with their work, which is creating a really, really meaningful impact on the ground, whether it’s climate or whether it’s people’s livelihoods. And another example, less related to data, but more related to the carbon credit side, is that people have been using CarbonHQ to kind of forecast and manage their carbon credit sales operation as well. It’s not our bread and butter, but it’s something that we do as well because at the end of the day, you need to, like, turn data into carbon credits and then sell the carbon credits. So, for that, again, the organization has fully embraced CarbonHQ. So, a lot of the time, when our product is not working, we get these, like, very panicked, angry messages about, you know, what is happening? Like, why is this not working? And the other angle is that they’re fully relying on our product for something that is very important to them. So, we don’t take that responsibility lightly as well, and it’s been great to see how our software is able to help them with streamlining current credit sales as well.
[00:23:30] Marta: That’s quite rewarding. I can relate to that. I see that you’re also a member of the Climate Action Data Trust. Can you just briefly mention what this is?
[00:23:41] Allen: Yeah. So, I’m also, like, a member of a couple of these, like, kind of industry organizations that focus on, I guess, aligning of data structures or practices in the carbon industry. So, another one that I’m part of is the Carbon Data Open Protocol, which is an initiative by the guys at Silvera and RMI. Unfortunately, like, I’m not, like, nearly as involved as I should be with these initiatives, but I think they’re incredibly valuable initiatives that eventually are going to benefit people like CarbonHQ significantly. Because right now, we’re, like, super busy and got our hands tied with cleaning up a mess within the project developer, like, kind of at an internal level. And then once, eventually, that work is hopefully done, one day, we’re going to figure out, okay, how do we actually make this interoperable and allow it to connect to different organizations, allow it to connect to the APIs of ratings agencies, of standard bodies of buyers and investors. And, truly, that’s going to drive the digital infrastructure of this entire industry. So, hopefully, their work is going to enable that for us down the track, but right now, we’re consumed with sorting out the mess internally.
[00:24:54] Marta: Yeah. Of course. Baby steps.
[00:24:56] Allen: That’s right. Baby steps, and it’s been four years as well. I mean, before this, I’ve never stayed at a job for longer than two years or, like, a year and a half. But for this, it just feels like it’s four years in, and it’s just baby steps as you’re talking about.
[00:25:13] Marta: I feel you. So, some closing questions for you, Allen. What are you more excited about in this space for the future? Are there any digital trends or anything that you are particularly excited about?
[00:25:27] Allen: Yeah. The big one is obviously DMRV, basically digitizing the entire monetary reporting verification purpose process and hopefully streamlining what used to be a 6 to 36-month process down to hopefully a matter of weeks, and I believe that’s going to fundamentally change the project economics of how these carbon projects work. We’ve heard about DMRV. We’ve talked about DMRV for a very long time, but I think we’re still yet to actually get it done. So, I’m very excited about actually making this happen.
[00:26:01] Marta: And the other question is, you are not just another person working in the industry. You are a founder of a company. That’s a very specific and exciting role. Do you have any advice for other people that are already founders or people that want to found a new company? Any inspirational advice?
[00:26:20] Allen: Just that it’s super hard. So, if you’re thinking that it’s going to be easy, probably think twice. It is really, really hard, but it’s also super, super rewarding. I think this person that I admire a lot, his name is Naval Ravikant or something. He’s a VC investor out of the U.S. I think he says something about once you taste the freedom, it makes a person unemployable. And it truly is. So, like, once you start something, once you get behind it, and once you see your product out there and people are using it, it really is like having a baby out there in the world. So, it is super rewarding. I think more people should do it because of how easy it is these days with AI, but don’t underestimate how much work it is.
[00:27:01] Marta: And finally, for people interested in this theme in the climate space, in digital DMRVs, do you have any resources that you want to share any book, or an article, or anything at all?
[00:27:16] Allen: So, when it comes to the DRIV, some of the stuff that I found really interesting, one is a report by the guys, a modern cooking facility or something, MECS. So, that one, they basically do an initial report on DMRV and look at how DMRV is, like, kind of defined differently by different people, and what are the existing solutions out there. And then, I guess, if you’re interested in kind of this part or, like, digital or, like, carbon credits, always feel free to, like, reach out to me. I’m more than happy to have a conversation as well. I think we’ll be starting to post some articles on our website about the work that we’re doing about the state of the MRV. So, again, if you’re interested, keep an eye out for those. So, carbonhq.earth.
[00:28:01] Marta: Perfect. Thank you so much for all your insights, Allen. It was a pleasure having you on this podcast.
[00:28:07] Allen: Awesome. Thank you so much, Martha, for having me. I’ve really enjoyed this conversation.
[00:28:11] Marta: That wraps up today’s episode with Allen, cofounder of CarbonHQ. Today, Allen and I discussed how moving carbon projects away from messy offline spreadsheets protects project cash flows, why data quality is carbon credit quality, how robust data collection tools stop errors at the front line, and the exciting future of the MRV to speed up credit insurance timelines from years down to weeks. You can find relevant links in our notes, and don’t forget to subscribe.
[00:28:46] Outro: Thanks for listening to Survey and Beyond, the data collection podcast by SurveyCTO. If you want to learn more about how SurveyCTO helps organizations collect reliable, secure, and scalable data anywhere in the world, visit www.surveycto.com. And if you are a fan of Survey and Beyond, consider leaving us a rating or review on your favorite podcast app. Your feedback helps more listeners discover these conversations and stay connected to the latest thinking in data collection. Don’t forget to follow us on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, or wherever you get your podcasts so you never miss an episode. On behalf of the entire SurveyCTO team, thanks again for joining us, and we will see you next time.